The terminology we use to describe our enemy in the war on terror matters a lot. A spirited debate is underway among specialists and in the press.
An op-ed published Monday in the New York Times entitled "What do you call a Terror(Jihad)ist?", by P.W. Singer and Elina Noor, attempts to defend the recent State Department memo advising government personal to refrain from using theologically-laden terms-"jihadi," "mujahidin," "caliphate," "Islamo-fascism," "salafi," "wahhabi," "ummah"-when describing Islamic radicals and their motives. Instead, generics-"terrorists," "extremists"-should suffice. Read more ...
Source: American Thinker
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Would a Jihadi by Any Other Name Smell as Foul?
Labels:
Extremist,
Gihadi,
Islamofascism,
Jihadi,
Lexicon,
Mujahideen,
Salafi,
State Department,
Terrorist,
Ummah,
Wahhabi