The Islamification of America, and the Emasculation of the U.S. Military

By Jim O'Neill

“The Muslims refuse our culture and try to impose their culture on us. I reject them, and this is not only my duty toward my culture—it is toward my values, my principles, my civilization.” —Oriana Fallaci (1929-2006)

“There exists a law, not written down anywhere, but in our hearts…. I refer to the law which lays it down that, if our lives are endangered by plots, or violence, or armed robbers, or enemies, any and every method of protecting ourselves is morally right.”—Cicero (106-43 BC)

It is well known that the Far Left and Islamic terrorists are in cahoots, as are liberals and “moderate” Muslims. Both sides are using the other as “useful idiots” to further their agendas—one ideological, and the other theological. One is using clandestine sabotage and subterfuge, while the other openly promotes global jihad.

Their common enemy is the “Great Satan” of the United States of America, which they agree, must be destroyed in order for their plans to proceed. For the time being, they are in league with one another.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon remains asleep at the wheel, busily enmeshed in asinine internecine squabbles, hamstringing our fighting forces, and covering their butts from charges of being politically incorrect.

They have taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies—foreign and domestic. But you sure wouldn’t know it from their betrayal of America’s fighting men and women, America’s citizens, and America herself.

Political correctness is a poison introduced by the Far Left over a period of decades. The infiltration of the U.S. Military by Muslims, is a fairly recent phenomenon traceable to Saudi Arabia, and the first Gulf War (1990-1991).

According to Harvard’s Dr. Gal Luft, “While the Saudis were adamantly opposed to any expression of religious practice by their guests, including a ban on Christmas carols, bible classes and Christian and Jewish prayers, they embarked on a well-orchestrated and generously funded effort sponsored by the Saudi government to convert as many American military members as possible to Islam.”

Luft concludes, “...it is time to investigate what exactly happened back then in the desert, and assess how serious and deep-rooted the damage is.”

Indeed, but will the quislings now pulling the strings in the higher echelons of the Pentagon, do so? I doubt it. They are much more concerned with promotions, pay grades, and political correctness; than with valor, integrity, and honoring their oaths. The Pentagon is infested with politically correct drones, who place what’s good for their careers, over what’s good for America.

Elaine Donnelly of CMR (Center for Military Readiness) states, “Both [Adm. Mike Mullen, and Gen. George Casey] have put the culture of the armed forces at risk with numerous statements advocating ‘diversity’ first, and the needs of the military second. ...No matter what the issue is, when officials make decisions…favoring individuals at the expense of the whole, they undermine key elements of military culture…. The culture of the military must not be taken for granted—it could be irreversibly degraded in a single generation.”

Ms. Donnelly is correct. A mere generation ago, it would have been unconscionable for the U.S. military to follow the orders of a CIC who surrounded himself with Communist and Marxist aides, refused to disclose his past, bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia, “forgot” to salute the American flag, and supported a Justice Department that was blatantly anti-American. (Here and Here)

America’s fighting men and women are still second to none, and our junior officers are generally first class, but it appears that a number of the military’s high command are unwilling to honor the oaths they’ve taken, and are an insult to the brave history of America’s armed forces, and a disgrace to the uniforms they wear. It would seem that flag officers like Boykin, Petraeus, and McChrystal are in short supply these days. (Source)

We are forced to witness the insanity of our military men and women being shackled by idiotic ROE (Rules of Engagement), and punished for any mishandling of America’s enemies, who hate us, do not “play fair,” and are committed to America’s destruction by any means.

Here are a few of the ROE currently in effect:

No night or surprise searches.

Villagers have to be warned prior to searches.

U.S. soldiers may not fire at the enemy unless the enemy is preparing to fire first.

U.S. forces cannot engage the enemy if civilians are present.

Troops can fire at an insurgent if they catch him placing an IED (Improvised Explosive Device) but not if insurgents are walking away from an area where explosives have been laid.

What kind of suicidal “shoot yourself in the foot” garbage is this? It can only be the result of some REMF idiots, passing along their lame-brained ideas, in order to buff up their PC credentials. Stop listening to these fools—get rid of them!

The next thing you know, we’ll be required to read enemy combatants the Miranda, as if…. Never-mind, we already are.

Given the caliber of much of the Pentagon’s “leadership.” one can only hope that the military’s version of Homeland Security, USNORTHCOM (U.S. Northern Command), is not as paranoid of a civilian revolt as Homeland Security apparently is.

Can you imagine the U.S. military attacking patriotic Americans, for daring to stand tall for the Constitution? Farcical irony indeed, but I don’t hear anybody laughing—except for the Far Left, and global jihadists.

The U.S. Military is, of course, not alone in being politically corrected and Islamized. America itself, is well along the road of Islamification and emasculation.

Burka Barbies and Che Guevara onesies. What’s next, Osama Bin Laden sippy cups?

Maybe Burka Barbies that reveal acid-scarred faces when you pull back the veil, or bloodstained Che Guevara onesies, would slap some of these liberal morons awake. Probably not—invincible ignorance runs deep.

Regarding the global jihad, Americans really need to wake up and pay attention to what has happened, is happening, and will happen in Europe—or as Oriana Fallaci called it, Eurabia. (Here and Here)

The Islamification of Europe is largely a fait accompli. If you like the idea of an Islamic America, then you’ll be happy—because we’re next. And the process is already well underway.

The Islamic threat to America is not limited to acts of outright terrorism. The left-wing and the Muslims share notes, of course, and the Islamic jihadist movement in America has taken to heart the Alinsky/Chicago model of bribery, threat, and intimidation.

If you are not up to speed on this subject, then you really should educate yourself—really.

Laus Deo.

Here are a few websites that you may find helpful:
Faith Freedom International—ex-Muslims against hate
Act! For America—Brigette Gabriel is one gutsy lady
Jihad Tube—“A picture is worth a thousand words”
Islam: the Religion of Peace (and a big stack of dead bodies)
Christian Action Network (CAN)—Christianity with backbone
Jihad Watch
Global Jihad
Get a copy of “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America”
By P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry

CFP

Jihad and the Relativist Enemy within

By Jeffrey Imm

In Washington D.C., when you go to the main city subway station (Metro Center), you will be surrounded by numerous advertisements showing images of Washington D.C. destroyed by a nuclear holocaust. The source of these images is the same source as images promoted on Jihadist web sites in May 2008. On May 29, 2008, the Daily Mail and other media reported that "SITE also released a computer-generated image, showing Washington D.C. in the aftermath of a nuclear attack, which reportedly appeared on an Islamist forum."

In both the D.C. subway advertisements and the Jihadist web sites, the images come from a "game" being promoted by the D.C.-area based Bethesda Softworks entitled "Fallout 3." Bethesda Softworks is located in Rockville, Maryland, a mere 18 miles from the White House in Washington, D.C. Bethesda Softworks' new software "game" Fallout 3 portrays "the Capitol Wasteland in and around Washington, DC," which the government-funded Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has agreed to advertise in the DC subway system used by over 800,000 government workers and individuals every day. This is the same "game" that Jihadists have obtained an image from to post on their websites of a destroyed, crushed America. (Note: while the D.C.'s Metro Center ads are not the exact same Fallout 3 image referenced in reports about Jihad websites, they are very similar Fallout 3 images of a destroyed Capitol building and other D.C. landmarks. The Fallout 3 image of the destroyed Capitol building on Jihad websites is promoted as free "computer wallpaper" on the Bethesda Softworks website.) Read more ...

Source: Family Security Matters

The 'Useful Idiots' of Militant Islam

Self-delusion reaches new heights when clueless Westerners defend Sharia, the "moderate" Muslim Brotherhood, and "mild" Islamism.

By Youssef M. Ibrahim

Somewhere during Lawrence of Arabia's blockbuster career, his bosses wondered if he was becoming "more Arab" in the desert to which they sent him to lead a revolt against the Ottoman Empire. In an endearing cue to imperial haughtiness, Field Marshal Lord Allenby asks if his man had "gone native."

Indeed the spymaster and legendary British officer became quickly enmeshed in the tangled web he weaved back at the turn of the last century.

Likewise, when communism dawned in the 1920s, Vladimir Lenin ordered a strategy of nurturing "useful idiots" - by which he meant a contingent of communist Lawrences in the West. It worked, spawning hundreds of thousands of enamored scholars, intellectuals, experts, and dreamy romantics waving the red flags of Bolsheviks over the 70 years of the Cold War.

Today’s Islamist Lawrences are being cultivated among a broad swath of political analysts, scholars, anthropologists, pundits, missionaries, and even spies dissecting militant Islam and Islamofascism. While most carry out illuminating and necessary work, the fish they bait ends up ensnaring many.

A few recent catches: the archbishop of Canterbury urging the introduction of Sharia law in Britain; Harvard University, a bastion of secular scholarship, shutting its gym to men to accommodate Muslim women; authorities at Minneapolis’s international airport negotiating for months with 700 Somali Muslim taxi drivers who refused to pick up passengers carrying liquor or depending on guide dogs.

Then there was President George Bush launching his Muslim initiative last June from the Islamic Center of Washington, a Saudi institution distributing educational material instructing Muslims to segregate themselves from other Americans.

Among other things, the Saudi-funded publications admonish Muslims in America "to dissociate from infidels, hate them for their religion, never to rely on them for support, and always oppose them in every way according to Islamic law." The question: how was it that among the estimated five million Muslim Americans with hugely varied institutions, the president's advisors picked a Saudi Islamofascist ghetto as a venue?

This cluelessness is spreading into the academy and the arts too.

Witness the Guggenheim Museum of New York and the Louvre of Paris, along with Carnegie Mellon, Texas A&M, and multiple U.S. institutions, rushing to open branches in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, where laws institutionalize bigotry against women, Sharia bans images, and the government condones grievous violations of human rights for millions of expatriates of other religions.

Imagine the contortions of folks at Yale, Stanford, or Oxford when they have to explain founding campuses in Riyadh where women are not allowed or can participate only via closed circuit TV.

Useful idiocy reaches a higher plane among Western pundits who propagate the Saudi view of reverse progress, namely that Islamic societies have "particular requirements" and are evolving as "different models," of which we should not be "judgmental."

Fundamentalist creep is engulfing bastions of respectability in Western media too. At the start of Turkey's slide away from secularism last May, the Wall Street Journal glossed over Prime Minister Erdogan's aggressive Islamization, criticizing his secular opponents instead. The Economist argued his policy is tolerable, "even if it means enduring a bad, ineffective, corrupt, or mildly Islamist government."

Last April a major New York Times Magazine article by James Traub argued fervently on behalf of "Islamic democrats" singing the praises of a reborn Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. This was followed by a major essay in Foreign Affairs, a weighty establishment publication, by Robert Leiken and Steven Brooke titled "The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood." The piece declared the fundamentalist group acceptable, among other things, as some of its leaders were interviewed in English, appeared reasonable, listened to classical music, and knew of Shakespeare. The article was so lacking in inquisitiveness it merited being posted on the Muslim Brotherhood website - ikhwanonline.com - as part of their propaganda.

The Bin Ladens: An Arabian Family in the American Century, a recent book authored by respected Mideast analyst of the New Yorker Steve Coll, presents the human side of Osama bin Laden, who adopted modern technology in his terror and whose wealthy contracting father employed Christians and other infidels in his business.

We should come back to reality.

Mild Islamism is an oxymoron. Sharia law, which sanctions beating of wives and stoning for adultery, is irreconcilable with human rights. The Muslim Brotherhood founded Hamas, calls suicide bombings a good thing, and is the 21st-century version of the organized fascism of Hitler and Mussolini in the last century.

Youssef M. Ibrahim, a former Middle East correspondent for the New York Times and Energy Editor of the Wall Street Journal, is a freelance writer and Mideast political risk consultant based in New York.

Source: Pajamas Media
H/T: Gramfan