Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Monday, January 18, 2010

Generation Abdulmutallab

The foiled attempt by young Nigerian extremist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow up Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas Day has baffled many Africans and sent them scrambling for an explanation.

This is not the stereotypical poor and desperate young man usually associated with violence on the continent. For one, Abdulmutallab is the son of a wealthy Nigerian banker and former government minister. His father even tipped off the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria to his son's growing radicalism.

Second, neither Islam nor Christianity is indigenous to Africa, and the idea of dying on behalf of a foreign religion is absurd to most Africans. Third, the United States was never a colonial power in Africa and, therefore, it seems an odd target. In fact, it's a popular destination for many young Nigerians looking to emigrate.

And yet, Africa only has to look within to find the causes for radicalization. About 60 percent of Africa's nearly 1 billion people are less than 30 years old. In the past few decades, these young people have become increasingly disaffected, lost, and restless, and who can blame them? Poorly educated and jobless, they have few role models with moral stature. The value system has collapsed.

Hard work and entrepreneurship no longer assure success and wealth. Political connections matter. The richest men in Africa are often heads of state and ministers. Of the 209 African heads of state since 1960, fewer than 15 can be classified as good, clean leaders. The rest -- an assortment of military brutes, briefcase bandits, and crackpot democrats -- are decidedly uninspiring.

How can Africa claim to be fighting terrorism when the chairman of the African Union itself is Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi, an admitted sponsor of terrorism?

At the United Nations' May 2002 Children's Summit in New York, youngsters from Africa stunned the audience by ripping into their leaders. "You get loans that will be paid in 20 to 30 years ... and we have nothing to pay them with because when you get the money, you embezzle it, you eat it," said 12-year-old Joseph Tamale from Uganda. Adam Maiga from Mali weighed in: "We must put an end to this demagoguery. You have parliaments, but they are used as democratic decoration."

Disenchanted by their own societies, African youth have become increasingly susceptible to radical ideas and religious extremists -- not just the Islamist fanatics in northern Nigeria and Somalia, but also the Christian variety (the Lord's Resistance Army in northern Uganda) and the traditionalist (the Mungiki sect in Kenya).

Some seek escape in rickety boats to Europe. Others turn to crime (drug trafficking, Internet scams), prostitution, and extremist groups that seek violent change. It is sclerotic leadership and catastrophic government failure -- not poverty -- that breed this hopelessness and despair in Africa's young people, luring them to extremism.

In many African countries, government has ceased to exist or function. In its place is a vampire state -- a government hijacked by unrepentant bandits who use the machinery of the state to enrich themselves, crush their enemies, and perpetuate themselves in office. In Chad, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Uganda, Sudan, and Zimbabwe, governments that scarcely provide basic social services are even at war with their own people. And their people have responded with violence.

Just last week, a separatist group, Front for the Liberation of the Enclave of Cabinda (FLEC), opened fire on a bus carrying the Togolese soccer team to the Africa Cup, killing the driver and two team officials. FLEC seeks independence from Angola, whose government is one of the worst of these dysfunctional bodies. What motivated these young men was likely not that different from what compelled Abdulmutallab to board that plane.

More at Foreign Policy





Friday, January 8, 2010

Semantic Confusion: “The Religious Right”, Allies or Antagonists?


The Confusion of Tongues
or
What You Said Ain’t What They Heard

(Guy DeWhitney) This was published a couple months ago at David Horowitz's NewsRealblog.com because a number "Conservative Christians" had objected to the venom someone else had directed toward "The Religious Right." The commentary response was enormous and spirited, with the consensus agreeing with almost all of my proposal.)

I have noticed lately a serious impediment to any real communication across political lines. It is something that can affect anyone writing or speaking about politics in America today. The problem lies in the term “Religious Right”.

On the one hand Conservative Christians do not seem to understand that non-Christians, many just as conservative see the term as a negative if not a pejorative. On the other hand non-Christians, Moderates, Liberals and Leftists do not seem to “get it” that many sane, un-hypocritical Conservative Christians define themselves with that same term.

When used by the middle/left the term virtually NEVER seems to mean anything BUT a classic, Right-wing “I’m right because the Bible says so, you can’t be moral without Jesus, this is a Christian Nation and non-Christians should not be allowed to influence schools and government” hypocrite-in-Christian’s-clothing” sort of person.

To say that this confusion impedes communication, compassion and compromise would be an understatement of monumental proportions.

Because of this confusion we recently saw Chris Mathews of MSNBC using the term in one way and offending NRB Columnist Paul Cooper who uses it in another. Paul responded by light of his definition which caused me to misunderstand and I started to type a flaming reply. Then I found out what Paul really meant by it; “those to the Right of middle who are Christian”.

The end result was that we barely missed getting in an argument over nothing. Both of us would have felt attacked by and embittered toward someone who should be an ally on the subject.

This problem in definitions needs to be resolved in order for NewsReal Blog to have any chance of changing partisans into partners on issues that affect all of us.

The last few days I have been asking everyone I can who THEY think of when they hear the term “Religious Right”.

Overwhelmingly those that did not self describe as Conservative Christians seem to believe the term to mean “the folks who believe being Christian gives them a preferred political status and the right to impose an overtly Christian character on civil society”.

Not one person I talked to that described themselves as moderate or liberal (regardless of their religion) saw the term as referring to any other group. ONLY the Conservative Christians I spoke with felt that it meant the “Right side of the spectrum of all religious Christians in the U.S.”

It is pretty clear that this confusion cannot be allowed to go on. As a start I propose a poll. Not a “vote” for one definition by majority rule, but simply a poll to make us aware of Who Thinks What Means Which.

Semantics Poll: Who Do You Call What?
(Actual Poll is at Heretics Crusade, please add your vote!)

I Self Identify As:

a) Non-religious (Atheist, Agnostic, Don’t Care)
b) A Nominal Christian
c) A Devout Christian (Liberal Politics)
d) A Devout Christian (Conservative Politics)
e) Jewish (Conservative politics)
f) Jewish (Liberal politics)
g) A Conservative Christian or Jewish far to the Right of the ones the public calls conservative. (“They call me Nut-case but Jesus/G*d will bless me for it”)
h) A Nominal Muslim
i) A Devout Muslim
j) A Devout Muslim (“They call me Terrorist but Allah(pbuh) will bless me for it!”)

To Me “Religious Right” Means:

A) Conservative Religious persons; i.e. devout religious people of any faith that fall to the Right of Middle in politics
B) Religious hypocrites that believe the “unquestionable Truth” of their religion gives them a preferred position in the political process. (This description fits not only Christian chauvinists but also Islamic Supremacists etc.)
C) Conservative Christians who use their religion as a guide in life. Including politics.
D) Same as B but limited to Christians
E) Something Else

The information this poll provides may well prove very valuable but we still need to agree on what the term means here at Muslims Against Sharia.

I feel that being understood accurately by the largest number of people is more important than being clear only to compatriots. I cannot see that preaching to the choir is very productive. Therefore I propose this array of definitions:

For (A) I think the term “Religious Conservative” would be less likely to be misunderstood.

The subset of people described by (B) can be called “Religious Radicals” or “Theocrats”.

For (C) I can see no reason not to simply use “Christian Conservative” since it is clear and self-explanatory.

We should try to refer to (D) as “The Religious Right”.

Being clear with how we use these terms may not solve all our differences but, it will certainly not hurt our efforts to resolve them.

"Language is Humanity Beating Broken Rhythms On a Pot With a Spoon While Believing We Make Music That Stirs the Heart of God"
Guy DeWhitney


Source: Guy DeWhitney's Heretics Crusade




Saturday, December 26, 2009

Website documenting Islamic hate faces death threats

By Bob Unruh

Radicals send photo of headless body: 'We will kill you. Like this'

A recent e-mail to a website launched after the 9/11 terror attacks to document the instances of Islamic violence said simply: "We will kill you. Like this ... "

The message included a photograph of a man who had been beheaded, his body resting chest down on grass and his lifeless head placed in the middle of his own back. Another photograph showed a bloody knife.

But the operator of The Religion of Peace website says those types of threats don't bother him much.

"I don't think anyone who is serious about killing me is going to announce it in advance," the operator, who uses the pseudonym Glen Reinsford, told WND. "Still, one more reason to stay anonymous."

Reinsford's website intends to demonstrate extreme violence is an integral part of fundamental Islam, not merely a means by which only radicals try to achieve "out-of-the-mainstream goals."

Its list of "offerings" from the "Religion of Peace" for a single day this week: In Iraq, a bomb was placed near an ancient Christian church and two were killed; three innocents were cut down by a Taliban bomb in Afghanistan, and in Baghdad Sunni bombers murdered five Shia pilgrims.

The site features a significant statistic: "Islamic Terrorists Have Carried Out more than 14,569 Deadly Terror Attacks since 9/11."

It also keeps readers updated on other statistics. For the week of Dec. 12-18, there were 42 jihad attacks, 182 people killed and 362 people critically injured. For the month of November, there were 139 attacks in 14 different nations involving five religions, with 529 fatalities and 1,075 critically injured.

The list is divided by years. Its many stark descriptions include a report from Nov. 24 in Afghanistan: "Four children are blown to bits when Islamic fundamentalists set off a roadside bomb next to a family vehicle."

Reinsford explained in his "About" page, his alarm came about because of the integration of Islam and violence, typified by the 9/11 attacks that killed almost 3,000 innocent bystanders.

"In fact, some Muslims actually celebrated the attacks, and not just overseas, but even in the offices of the U.S. State Department," he wrote. "There were a few passionless, self-serving denunciations, to be sure, but Muslims save their real outrage for times when a Western leader makes a public statement against veils and headscarves, or someone draws a Muhammad cartoon.

"By and large, most could hardly care less about the thousands of people who lose their lives in the name of this religion each year. It was not for three years, in fact, that there was even a fatwa issued against these attacks. To this day, major Muslim-American groups are reluctant to denounce Osama Bin Laden by name," he said.

Islam, he noted, has been called a "religion of peace" by many, including President George W. Bush, who said, "The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam … Islam is peace."

But Reinsford believes Islam inspires not only "an enormous amount of violence, but an astonishing level of indifference and self-centeredness as well."

"We watched in the months following 9/11, as Muslim-American groups began to act as hindrances in the war on terror and the efforts of Americans to defend themselves. We saw them ignore nearly every act of daily Islamic terror and instead publicize obscure issues and personal slights against Muslims and 'insults to Islam' that are absolutely trivial by comparison.

"Finally, we came to realize that this extraordinary arrogance and self-absorption on the part of the Muslim community, along with an inability to empathize with people who are not like them or engage in the sort of self-critique that leads to moral progress is in no way incidental to the religion.

"There is something deeply, deeply wrong with Islam," Reinsford wrote.

He said the site originally was begun "in the naïve hope" that Muslims just didn't realize the extent of the violence done in the name of Islam.

"Perhaps," he wrote, "if they understood, then they might be motivated to turn the critical eye inward and resolve those far more important issues that leave so many lives in agony and force the consumption of so many billions of dollars in security resources."

However, "we never once heard" from a Muslim condemning the violence.

So the mission was refined to "present the truth about Islam and how it is so tragically different from other religions, including its incompatibility with secularism and Western liberal values," he said.

"The ridiculous level of violence committed in the name of this religion is staggering, despite the many billions of dollars that are spent each year to prevent attacks," he said. "Muslim apologists are constantly telling Westerners that the solution to the violence is greater understanding and tolerance for Islam. But isn't it the killers and their supporters who need lessons in tolerance and understanding … not their victims?"

The website notes the horrific toll from Islamic attacks, with more victims each year than there were in all 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition.

"Islamic terrorists murder more people every day than the Ku Klux Klan has in the last 50 years."

In the e-mail interview, Reinsford told WND his is a one-man operation that costs several thousands dollars a year to keep online. The website came about to make a point about the extent of violence; not necessarily a reaction to the terrorism "but rather to the apathy on the part of Muslims."

"While I would say that most Muslims probably don't agree with Islamic terror, the things that do seem to genuinely upset them instead (such as cartoons and hijab bans) seem relatively trivial to me. Early on I realized that there is something about Islam that really skews priorities."

His work essentially is to simply list the incidents of violence.

"The data for the list of attacks is compiled daily from Internet news sources. I try to stick with the more reliable reports – and I do strive for accuracy, although I'm sure the list is far from perfect," he told WND.

"For one thing, there is an awful lot that is missed, usually because it isn't reported. The genocide in Darfur is probably the best example. I don't have very many victims listed even though there have been plenty."

"Those committing the violence do so explicitly in the name of Islam, which Westerners should find alarming given the rising assertiveness on the part of a growing Muslim minority within our own borders," he said.

The sword and whip mentality in Islam also causes him concern.

"How can we expect Islam to be of benefit to the West when it can't even produce countries that attract Muslims?" he wondered.

His website notes attacks have been documented in Iraq, India, Sudan, Algeria, Afghanistan, New York, Pakistan, Israel, Russia, Chechnya, the Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria, England, Thailand, Spain, Egypt, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Pennsylvania, Denmark, Germany, Denmark, Canada and a long list of additional nations totaling more than 60.

In a previous interview with Chadd de las Casas at Associated Content, Reinsford said he was prompted to start the work, which he does on a volunteer basis, after a Islamic attack on a Hindu temple in India about a year after 9/11.

The massacre generally was ignored by the Western media, "and it occurred to me how common Islamic terror is that such a brutal incident should receive only passing attention," he said.

He also credits the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an Islamic advocacy group that was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a terror funding case. He said he was "repulsed by their lack of moral perspective."

The website also honors a "Dhimwit" of the month, which for November was Gen. George Casey for emphasizing the military's "diversity" after a Muslim activist, Nidal Hasan, allegedly shot and killed 13 adults and an unborn baby at Fort Hood in Texas.

An earlier honoree was President Obama, for "reaching out" to the Taliban and Iran as well as a variety of other acts.

Reinsford said his work is based in factual reporting, and he tries to avoid editorializing.

"Not all of Islam is bad, and certainly not all Muslims (or even a majority, for that matter) are bad people. Don't put the agenda before the truth, and always be willing to recognize when your own worldview needs to be adjusted," he said.

But he said, "No other religion inspires the sort of terrorism that the 'religion of peace' produces.

"We hope that this list offers a dose of perspective against so-called 'Islamophobia' and other Muslim complaints that are petty by comparison. As the site Bare Naked Islam puts it, 'It isn't Islamophobia when they really are trying to kill you.'"

WND





Monday, November 23, 2009

Poll: Who is Responsible for Terrorist Acts?

Majority of the terrorist acts of the last three decades, including the 9/11 attacks,
were perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists in the name of Islam.

 I am a Muslim
True
I don't know
False
Islamic terrorism is a Zionist myth

 I am not a Muslim
True
I don't know
False
Islamic terrorism is a Zionist myth

  



Sunday, November 22, 2009

Reality Check: The Hajj

This month, hundreds of thousands of Muslim pilgrims from around the globe are converging upon the Saudi Arabian holy cities of Mecca and Medina to perform the hajj, the pilgrimage that believers are supposed to make at least once in their lives as long as they have the health and the means to manage it.

The hajj takes place this year from Nov. 25 to 29, but many of the faithful are already thronging the airport and docks of Jeddah, the main entry point for pilgrims.

It's an event of huge religious significance. Some three million Muslims from all around the world -- Indians and Pakistanis, Nigerians and Bosnians, Arabs and non-Arabs, rich and poor, Sunni and Shia -- will commune, worship, and celebrate the global unity of Islam.

They'll be performing the same set of ritual acts, dressed in exactly the same clothes, all equal in the sight of God. For those who've completed the hajj, it's a lifetime landmark, a transformative religious experience.

In reality, though, there's another reason why the hajj is important -- even if most Muslims would rather it weren't the case.

Today's hajj -- given the widening sectarian rifts within Islam -- is also very much about politics.

To some extent, of course, it's always been that way. The royals in Riyadh have always taken their guardianship of the Two Holy Places in Mecca and Medina as a key to the spiritual and political guidance of the global community of believers. (It should be said, by the way, that though the Saudis invariably evoke the "nonpolitical" character of the hajj, they've also been known to shower pilgrims with literature espousing the benefits of the sere Wahhabi version of Islam that holds inside the kingdom.)

Given this potentially explosive mix of politics and religion, the recent war of words between the governments of Iran and the hajj's Saudi Arabian hosts deserves to be taken seriously.

On Oct. 26, Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, met with officials from the Iranian hajj organizing committee and seized the occasion to rail against alleged past mistreatment of his compatriots during the pilgrimage.

"Such acts are against the unity of Muslims and contribute to the goals and wishes of the U.S. and foreign intelligence services," he said. "The Saudi government should fulfill its duty in confronting these acts."

More at Foreign Policy





Poll: Does Islam Need to Be Reformed?

 Does Islam Need to Be Reformed?

 I am a Muslim
You are blasphemous pigs; you all should be beheaded
No, it is perfect as it is
Yes, but your reforms go too far
Yes, your plan is perfect
Yes, but your reforms do not go far enough

 I am not a Muslim
Muslims cannot be trusted; this is a covert Islamization strategy
No, it is perfect as it is
Yes, but your reforms go too far
Yes, your plan is perfect
Yes, but your reforms do not go far enough

  



Many of our readers, both Muslim and non-Muslim expressed their opinions about our course that varied from total support to death threats. There were also many questions about what is the reaction to our plans to reform Islam. Well, now everybody can express their opinions and gauge the reaction at the same time.

Please note: you cannot vote more than once in the same poll.

If you chose "Yes, but your reforms go too far" or "Yes, but your reforms do not go far enough", please feel free to elaborate in the comment section.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Poll: Does the URJ legitimize Islamofascism by creating an alliance with ISNA?


When a major Jewish organization (URJ - Union for Reform Judaism) allies itself with Islamic extremist organization (ISNA - American branch of Muslim Brotherhood) and URJ president states: "Islamic extremists constitute a profound threat. For some, this is a reason to flee from dialogue, but in fact the opposite is true," do the actions of the URJ and its president amount to legitimizing Islamofascism?

 I am a Muslim
Yes
No

 I am a Jew
Yes
No

 I am neither a Muslim nor a Jew
Yes
No

  



Friday, November 13, 2009

Poll: Which Speech is Free Speech?

Which Speech is Free Speech?

 I am a Muslim
Inoffensive speech
Speech offensive for reasons other than listed below
Defaming one's family & all of the above
Defaming religion, mocking prophets & all of the above
Inciting violence & all of the above
Conspiring to commit violence & all of the above

 I am not a Muslim
Inoffensive speech
Speech offensive for reasons other than listed below
Defaming one's family & all of the above
Defaming religion, mocking prophets & all of the above
Inciting violence & all of the above
Conspiring to commit violence & all of the above

  


Monday, November 9, 2009

Poll: Should honorcide be classified as a hate crime?

Should honorcide be classified as a hate crime?

 I am a Muslim
Yes
No
No: any female dishonoring her family must be disciplined
No: any female dishonoring her family must severely punished
No: any female dishonoring her family must be put to death
No: honorcide is a fiction

 I am not a Muslim
Yes
No
No: any female dishonoring her family must be disciplined
No: any female dishonoring her family must severely punished
No: any female dishonoring her family must be put to death
No: honorcide is a fiction

  


Sunday, November 8, 2009

Europeans too selfish to have children, says Chief Rabbi

The leader of Britain’s Jewish community claimed the continent’s population is in decline because people care more about shopping than the sacrifice involved in parenthood.

He blamed atheist “neo-Darwinians” for Europe’s low birth rate and said religious people of all denominations are more likely to have large families.

The Chief Rabbi, who entered the House of Lords last week, made his comments in a lecture on religion in the 21st century hosted by Theos, the public theology think-tank, on Wednesday night.

Lord Sacks said that faith had survived so far because it could provide answers to mankind’s eternal search for meaning in life - unlike the market, the state, science or philosophy, which underpin modern liberal democracies.

He claimed religion could continue to play an important role worldwide in the future, by engaging in debate with scientists, by campaigning on issues such as global poverty or the environment, and by discussing the nature of the common good with humanists.

The Chief Rabbi warned that secular Europe is at risk, however, because its moral relativism can easily be defeated by fundamentalists.

And he claimed that its population is also in decline, compared with every other part of the world, because non-believers lack shared values of family and community that religions have.

Lord Sacks said: “Parenthood involves massive sacrifice of money, attention, time and emotional energy.

“Where today in European culture with its consumerism and instant gratification – because you’re worth it – where will you find space for the concept of sacrifice for the sake of generations not yet born?

“Europe, at least the indigenous population of Europe, is dying.”

“That is one of the unsayable truths of our time. We are undergoing the moral equivalent of climate change and no one is talking about it.

“Albert Camus once said, 'The only serious philosophical question is why should I not commit suicide?’.

“I think he was wrong. The only serious philosophical question is, why should I have a child? Our culture is not giving an easy answer to that question.”

He added: “Wherever you turn today - Jewish, Christian or Muslim - the more religious the community, the larger on average are their families.

“The major assault on religion today comes from the neo-Darwinians.’’

Discussing the popular secular idea that there are no absolute moral values, he said: “You cannot defend a civilisation on the basis of moral relativism.

“In a head-to-head contest between a moral relativist and a fundamentalist, who wins? The fundamentalist must win because he is sure he’s right, and you are not sure he’s wrong.”

He said that although the war on terror had been portrayed by Western politicians as a “battle of ideas”, there is little hope that Islamists who believe they owe allegiance to God would be swayed by talk of freedom or democracy.

“The place for religion is in civil society, where it achieves many things essential to liberal democratic freedom. It sanctifies marriage and the family and the obligations of parenthood, and it safeguards the non-relativist moral principles on which Western freedom is based.

“It may not be religion that is dying, it may be liberal democratic Europe that is in danger, demographically and in its ability to defend its own values.”

Lord Sacks, who has been Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth since 1991, described the modern phenomenon of “angry atheists” as the “intellectual equivalent of road rage”.

He said that more respectful dialogue is needed between religious groups and the secular world.

“All peace depends on compromise and that is why peace comes to seem to some religious groups to be a form of betrayal, and that is why peacemakers get assassinated.”

Source: Telegraph




Poll: What drives some government, media and religious figures to embrace Islamic extremists?

What drives some government, media and religious figures to embrace Islamic extremists?

 I am a Muslim
Inevitability of Islamic world domination
Social justice
Political correctness
Fear of being labeled a racist
Ignorance and/or stupidity

 I am not a Muslim
Inevitability of Islamic world domination
Social justice
Political correctness
Fear of being labeled a racist
Ignorance and/or stupidity

  


Friday, November 6, 2009

Poll: Is al Qaeda / Hamas / Muslim Brotherhood / Palestinian Islamic Gihad a terrorist organization?

Is AQ/Hamas/MB/PIG a terrorist organization?

I am a MuslimOrganizationI am not a Muslim
  Yesal Qaeda   Yes
  No   No
  
 
  YesHamas   Yes
  No   No
  
 
  YesMuslim Brotherhood   Yes
  No   No
  
 
  YesPalestinian Islamic Gihad   Yes
  No   No
  


Thursday, November 5, 2009

Poll: Is terrorism (targeting civilians) an acceptable tactic?

Is terrorism (targeting civilians) an acceptable tactic?

 I am a Muslim
Terrorism (targeting civilians) is unacceptable in any way shape or form
9/11 was justified
New York should be nuked

 I am not a Muslim
Terrorism (targeting civilians) is unacceptable in any way shape or form
Destroying Grand Mosque in Mecca during worship would be justified
Mecca should be nuked and its crater filled with pig blood

  


Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Poll: Under which circumstances could civilian deaths be acceptable?

Under which circumstances could civilian deaths be acceptable?

 I am a Muslim
No civilian deaths (even as collateral damage) are ever justified
Targeting civilians is never justified
Targeting civilians is justified as long as they are non-Muslim
Some terrorism acts are justified, if they advance the cause of Islam
Any act committed to advance the cause of Islam is not terrorism

 I am not a Muslim
No civilian deaths (even as collateral damage) are ever justified
Targeting civilians is never justified
Targeting civilians is justified as long as they are Muslim
Some terrorism acts are justified, if they advance the cause of Democracy
Any act committed to advance the cause of Democracy is not terrorism

  


Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Poll: What is Gihad?

What Is Gihad?

 I am a Muslim
Religious obligation of every Muslim to strife for Islamic world domination by any means
Religious obligation of every Muslim to strife for Islamic world domination by non-violent means
Internal struggle to improve oneself
Meaningless concept made up by Neocons to justify Muslim boogiemen label

 I am not a Muslim
Religious obligation of every Muslim to strife for Islamic world domination by any means
Religious obligation of every Muslim to strife for Islamic world domination by non-violent means
Internal struggle to improve oneself
Meaningless concept made up by Neocons to justify Muslim boogiemen label

  


Monday, November 2, 2009

Poll: Why do the media and the U.N. concentrate on Arab-Israeli conflict, not on Darfur?

Why does the media and the U.N. concentrate on Arab-Israeli conflict (tens of thousands of deaths)
while paying much less attention to Darfur conflict (hundreds of thousands of deaths)?

 I am a Muslim
When a Muslim is killed by a Jew, it is an atrocity; when a Muslim is killed by a Muslim, it is not a big deal
Israel is accessible to the media and Sudan is not
Who cares about Sudan?
The media and the U.N. are inherently anti-Semitic
The numbers in this question are reversed; Darfur conflict is blown out of proportion by Zionist propaganda machine that controls the media and the U.N.

 I am a Jew
When a Muslim is killed by a Jew, it is an atrocity; when a Muslim is killed by a Muslim, it is not a big deal
Israel is accessible to the media and Sudan is not
Who cares about Sudan?
The media and the U.N. are inherently anti-Semitic
The numbers in this question are reversed; Darfur conflict is blown out of proportion by Zionist propaganda machine that controls the media and the U.N.

 I am neither a Muslim nor a Jew
When a Muslim is killed by a Jew, it is an atrocity; when a Muslim is killed by a Muslim, it is not a big deal
Israel is accessible to the media and Sudan is not
Who cares about Sudan?
The media and the U.N. are inherently anti-Semitic
The numbers in this question are reversed; Darfur conflict is blown out of proportion by Zionist propaganda machine that controls the media and the U.N.

  


Sunday, November 1, 2009

Poll: Who Are Muslims Against Sharia?

Muslims Against Sharia is:

 I am a Muslim
A group of Muslim reformists
A group of misguided Muslims
A Crusader/Neocon/Zionist conspiracy

 I am not a Muslim
A group of Muslim reformists
A group of misguided Muslims
An Islamic conspiracy

  


Saturday, October 31, 2009

Poll: Who holds moral high ground in the Arab-Israeli conflict?

Who holds moral high ground in the Arab-Israeli conflict?

 I am a Muslim
Muslims
Jews
Neither
I don't know

 I am a Jew
Muslims
Jews
Neither
I don't know

 I am neither a Muslim nor a Jew
Muslims
Jews
Neither
I don't know

  


Friday, October 30, 2009

Poll: Do most non-Muslims dislike or hate Muslims?


Do most non-Muslims dislike or hate Muslims?

 I am a Muslim
Yes, because non-Muslims are evil
Yes, because non-Muslims are ignorant about Islam
I don't know
No

 I am not a Muslim
Yes, because Islam is evil
Yes, because all Muslims support terrorism
I don't know
No

  


Thursday, October 29, 2009

Poll: Were the Crusades unprovoked acts of aggression?


Were the Crusades unprovoked acts of aggression?

 I am a Muslim
Yes
I don't know
No

 I am not a Muslim
Yes
I don't know
No

  



FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

Followers

Copyright Muslims Against Sharia 2008. All rights reserved. E-mail: info AT ReformIslam.org
Stop Honorcide!



Latest Recipients of
The Dhimmi Award
Dr. Phil
George Casey


The Dhimmi Award


Previous Recipients of
The Dhimmi Award




Latest Recipient of the
World-Class Hypocrite Award
Mainstream Media


World-Class Hypocrite Award


Previous Recipients of the
World-Class Hypocrite Award




Latest Recipient of the
MASH Award
Dr. Arash Hejazi


MASH Award


Previous Recipients of the
MASH Award




Latest Recipient of the
Yellow Rag Award
CNN


Yellow Rag Award


Previous Recipients of the
Yellow Rag Award




Latest Recipient of
The Face of Evil Award
Nidal Malik Hasan


The Face of Evil Award


Previous Recipients of
The Face of Evil Award




Latest Recipients of the
Distinguished Islamofascist Award
ADC, CAIR, MAS


Distinguished Islamofascist Award


Previous Recipients of the
Distinguished Islamofascist Award




Latest Recipient of the
Goebbels-Warner Award
ISNA


Goebbels-Warner Award


Previous Recipients of the
Goebbels-Warner Award




Muslm Mafia



Latest Recipient of the
Evil Dumbass Award
Somali Pirates


Evil Dumbass Award


Previous Recipients of the
Evil Dumbass Award




Insane P.I. Bill Warner
Learn about
Anti-MASH
Defamation Campaign

by Internet Thugs




Latest Recipient of the
Retarded Rabbi Award
Shmuley Boteach


Retarded Rabbi Award


Previous Recipients of the
Retarded Rabbi Award




Latest Recipient of the
Mad Mullah Award
Omar Bakri Muhammed


Mad Mullah Award


Previous Recipients of the
Mad Mullah Award




Stop Sharia Now!
ACT! For America




Latest Recipient of the
Demented Priest Award
Desmond Tutu


Demented Priest Award


Previous Recipients of the
Demented Priest Award




Egyptian Gaza Initiative

Egyptian Gaza




Note: majority of users who have posting privileges on MASH blog are not MASH members. Comments are slightly moderated. MASH does not necessarily endorse every opinion posted on this blog.



HONORARY MEMBERS
of

Muslims Against Sharia
Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
Hasan Mahmud

ANTI-FASCISTS of ISLAM
Prominent.Moderate.Muslims
Tewfik Allal
Ali Alyami & Center for Democracy and Human Rights in Saudi Arabia
Zeyno Baran
Brigitte Bardet
Dr. Suliman Bashear
British Muslims
for Secular Democracy

Center for Islamic Pluralism
Tarek Fatah
Farid Ghadry &
Reform Party of Syria

Dr. Tawfik Hamid
Jamal Hasan
Tarek Heggy
Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser &
American Islamic
Forum for Democracy

Sheikh Muhammed Hisham
Kabbani & Islamic
Supreme Council of America

Sayed Parwiz Kambakhsh
Nibras Kazimi
Naser Khader &
The Association
of Democratic Muslims

Mufti Muhammedgali Khuzin
Shiraz Maher
Irshad Manji
Salim Mansur
Maajid Nawaz
Sheikh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi
& Cultural Institute of the
Italian Islamic Community and
the Italian Muslim Assembly

Arifur Rahman
Raheel Raza
Imad Sa'ad
Secular Islam Summit
Mohamed Sifaoui
Mahmoud Mohamed Taha
Amir Taheri
Ghows Zalmay
Supna Zaidi &
Islamist Watch /
Muslim World Today /
Council For Democracy And Tolerance
Prominent ex-Muslims
Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Magdi Allam
Zachariah Anani
Nonie Darwish
Abul Kasem
Hossain Salahuddin
Kamal Saleem
Walid Shoebat
Ali Sina & Faith Freedom
Dr. Wafa Sultan
Ibn Warraq

Defend Freedom of Speech

ISLAMIC FASCISTS
Islamists claiming to be Moderates
American Islamic Group
American Muslim Alliance
American Muslim Council
Al Hedayah Islamic Center (TX)
BestMuslimSites.com
Canadian Islamic Congress
Canadian Muslim Union
Council on American-Islamic Relations
Dar Elsalam Islamic Center (TX)
DFW Islamic Educational Center, Inc. (TX)
Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (Closed)
Ed Husain & Quilliam Foundation
Islamic Association for Palestine (Closed)
Islamic Association of Tarrant County (TX)
Islamic Center of Charlotte (NC) & Jibril Hough
Islamic Center of Irving (TX)
Islamic Circle of North America
Islamic Cultural Workshop
Islamic Society of Arlington (TX)
Islamic Society of North America
Masjid At-Taqwa
Muqtedar Khan
Muslim American Society
Muslim American Society of Dallas (TX)
Muslim Arab Youth Association (Closed)
Muslim Council of Britain
Muslims for Progressive Values
Muslim Public Affairs Council
Muslim Public Affairs Council (UK)
Muslim Students Association
National Association of Muslim Women
Yusuf al Qaradawi
Wikio - Top Blogs