 Sudan is accusing the upcoming Danish movie by Susanne Bier of being in the same class as the Muhammmed cartoons. Sudan's government are upset at the Danish movie Civilization ("Hævnen", literally 'the revenge'), which director Susanne Bier is shooting in Kenya and Denmark. The movie is an extension of the anti-Islam Dutch movie "Fitna" and the Danish Muhammed cartoons, says the Sudanese foreign ministry.
Susanne Bier's movie is based on the war in Sudan's Darfur region, and follows the trail from refugee camps in Sudan to life in a town in South Funen.
Sudan's foreign ministry says in a press release that the people responsible for "Civilization" intend to "represent nonexistent conditions in Darfur" and that the movie represents a "new step of the hostile forces who work to prolong the war in Darfur."
The spokesperson for Sudan's foreign ministry, Muawiya Osman Khalid, says that the 'production of this racist movie should be seen as a new extension of the notorious 'Fitna' movie and the cartoons which insult the prophet Muhammed," the official Sudanese news agency Suna reported Tuesday.
Khalid says that the Danish film crew shot in the Kukobi refugee camp in Kenya, where, according to Khalid, the crew duped the refugees to get them to play war victims from Darfur for a price of 2000-5000 Kenyan Shillings.
The spokesperson for the Sudanese foreign ministry says that they residents of the Kukobi camp launched a campaign against the movie.
Actors Trine Dyrholm, Ulrich Thomsen and Swedish Mikael Persbrandt appear in the film. The Danish Movie Institute gave the movie 7 million kroner, and it is expected in movie theaters this August.
Source: Fyens Stiftstidende (Danish)
With thanks to Islam in Europe
At last a convention to openly speak
about what need to be spoken. Please
do participate in the convention.
This December 10th will mark the 61st anniversary of the signing of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Yet even today, Human Rights violations continue to take place, even where UN peace keeping forces are deployed. Facts about human rights violations that have been documented by peace keeping forces and human rights groups have been stamped "censored" and hidden in a dark corner of a document storage bank. The UN is proving its useless, as ongoing assaults on humanity continue.
The latest genocide is currently taking place in Darfur, and once again perpetrators have a free hand as UN imposed censorship is giving them the sense that no one is watching. Beside the UN's censorship, political excuses over cultural lines and an unwillingness to accept the suffering of others has created a fertile ground to harbor hatred, fanatacism, and impunity in the global society.
As the assault on humanity continues, a group of individuals that have either themselves faced genocide or are the descendants of genocide victims (including unrecognized genocides such as the Armenian genocide, Indian partition genocide, etc.) have decided to come out and cross social, ideological, national, religious, and cultural boundaries to stand up and give shape to a global convention. Initially sponsored by realcourage.org, we now have a few more organizations supporting our mission to hail human rights over other issues.
In our 'Stop Ideological genocide convention', we are not gathering to blame individuals but rather to point out the factors that are giving shape to systemic failures, due to which children are being raised in an environment of hate. Our stand is not against individual identity, but rather on cultures, states, religions, or political identities that eclipse our shared human identity. We see these policies giving shape to human suffering in the 21st century. We're victims as a result of the above, but none of us are bitter. We are however concerned about how politics are taking away the right of people to complete their grieving and start a new life.
Some of these global political policies of providing excuses for the action of perpetrators have not only marginalized the victims, but have also pushed the victims into a vulnerable state. This irresponsible attitude of mainstream politics has opened a totally new chain of global-organized crime in which political parties from all sides can hire global Jihadis to fight for their designated political goals, which can then jeopardize civil society, such as has been observed during theYugoslavian war, Iran-Iraq war, and Afghanistan war, sri-lankan LTTE conflict, or British PIRA conflict.
Further, a designated financial banking system has evolved to fund these genocidal projects, and has penetrated into our democratic system. These concerns and more will be the issues covered by speakers, experts and victims involved directly, and will reveal the realities on the ground.
Come with friends, and join us in recognizing people's suffering while trying to understand and discuss the problems. Hear Moderate Muslims speak of how their right to interpret their own religion is being denied to them strategically, forcing the entire 1.3 billion member society to either accept the Khomaeinist, salafist or Saudi sponsored Wahabi version of their religion. Hear the Darfuri describe the horror being visited upon the people of Darfur. Hear about Bangladesh genocide, discrimination of womens and Kashmir suffering, and much more.
We invite you to stand with us in our 'Stop Ideological genocide convention', as political correctness sight cultural sensitivity as an excuse to condemn Human killings.
Nurnberg, Germany.
12:00 – 15:45 Hrs
Chilli's Mexican Restaurant, Pfannenschmiedsgasse 1., D90402 Nurnberg.
15:45 Hrs - 16:00 Hrs
Candle light march to Human Rights street (Stra?e Der Menschenrechte)
Washington DC, United States.
12:30 PM ET to 2:45 PM
National Press Club News Conference, 529 14th Street, NW 13th Floor, Washington, DC 20045 — Zenger Room
4 PM ET to 6 PM
Washington DC Public Outreach - Freedom Plaza, 14th and Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Events also being held in:
New York, United States.
Los Angeles, United States.
Source: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=app_2344061033&ref=ts&gid=169843290601#/event.php?eid=187767134797&index=1H/T: http://www.realcourage.org/2009/12/december-10-real-europe/
 The US has said it will renew tough economic sanctions against Sudan soon, but also promised broad engagement with Khartoum in an effort to end the "ongoing dire human consequences of genocide" in Darfur. Barack Obama, the US president, said that if the government of Sudan acted to improve the situation on the ground, there would be "incentives". But if Sudan did not act, "then there will be increased pressure imposed by the US and the international community". The UN estimates that as many as 300,000 people have died and more than two million have been driven from their homes in Darfur since 2003, when mostly non-Arab fighters took up arms against the Khartoum government. Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, said genocide was taking place in the region and that Washington's focus would be on protecting civilians, helping displaced persons and ensuring that fighters were disarmed. In his statement on Monday, Obama said: "Sudan is now poised to fall further into chaos if swift action is not taken. "First, we must seek a definitive end to conflict, gross human-rights abuses and genocide in Darfur. "Second, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the North and South in Sudan must be implemented to create the possibility of long-term peace." Clinton said the new Obama policy toward Sudan would include "a menu of incentives and disincentives" but refused to specify what they might be. Read more here,,,, Source: Al Jazeera (English) 
In a September 29th report in the Washington Post, Major General Scott Gration, the US Special Envoy for Sudan, stated that he plans to implement a “normative” relations policy to solve the Darfur crisis with the only war-crime indicted President in the world, Omar Al-Bashir. Gration believes that positive cooperation with the Sudanese government is the best way to end the genocide: “We've got to think about giving out cookies. Kids, countries, they react to gold stars, smiley faces, handshakes, agreements, talk,” Gration stated.
The Damanga Coalition for Freedom and Democracy is extremely saddened by Gration’s proposal and naïve remarks about Darfur and the Sudanese government. It is clear that Gration and the Obama administration fail to realize or choose to ignore the severity of the genocide and rampant corruption within the Sudanese government. As fellow Darfur activist John Prendergast bluntly criticized Gration in the report, “They [The Sudanese Government] do not respond to nice guys [like Gration] coming over and saying, 'We have to be a good guest…they eat these people for dinner.”
It appears that Gration and the Obama administration have no plans to hold the Sudanese government and President Omar Al-Bashir accountable for their crimes against humanity-killing more than 450,000 innocent people thus far. As Gration begins his normative relations process with ICC-indicted Bashir, countless Darfuris will continue to be killed, detained, and raped while their villages, from Jabel Mara to Kornoy to El-geneina on the western border, are pillaged and destroyed. It is obvious now that Gration, who denied a full-fledged Darfuri genocide and merely called it “a remnant genocide," is paving the way for the Sudanese government to escape accountability and punishment for their crimes against humanity; it is shame that the U.S. seems to be working for the criminal government rather than protecting the victims of Darfur.
Damanga Coalition for Freedom and Democracy strongly condemns Gration’s naïve and unfair policy and strongly urges the following actions to be implemented:
- Immediately act to reconsider this policy before any serious implementation occurs.
- Replace Gration with a strong, honest, and effective new envoy for Sudan.
- Terminate U.S. relations with the Sudanese government to protect the rights of Darfuris.
- Arrest Al-Bashir and the associated Sudanese government officials and transport them to the ICC before any peace negotiations take place.
- Suspend elections in Sudan until all refugees are returned, their villages rebuilt, and the Janjaweed settlers are evacuated.
- Fully deploy the promised 26,000 UN Peace keepers with helicopters and associated financial and logistical resources to fully protect the Darfuri refugees.
- Enact a non-fly zone over Darfur to protect innocent Darfuris from Sudanese aircraft bombings.
-Disarm the Janjaweed Arab militias immediately.
Source: damanga
 Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, has said much of Africa's violence is due to foreign meddling, pointing the accusing finger at Israel. Gaddafi, who is also chairman of the African Union (AU), was speaking on Monday at a special summit of the group, which is coinciding with the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the coup that brought him to power. Israel is "behind all of Africa's conflicts", Gaddafi told about 30 African leaders gathered under a huge tent at Tripoli airport.
"As African brothers, we must find solutions to stop the superpowers who are pillaging our continent," he said. He demanded the closure of all Israeli embassies across Africa, describing Israel as a "gang" and saying it uses "the protection of minorities as an excuse to launch conflicts".
Israel has acknowledged operating what it called a forward policy in Africa between the 1960s and 1980s, intervening in wars in Ethiopia, Uganda and Sudan. Gaddafi claimed that a Darfur rebel group had opened an office in Tel Aviv while its leader lives under French protection, a reference to Abdelwahid Mohammed Nur, the head of the Sudan Liberation Army who lives in exile in Paris, France. Al Jazeera's Amr El-Kahky, reporting from the Libyan capital, Tripoli, said: "Libya is portraying itself as opening up, but it is still holding to the same principle: which is anti-Israel feeling, and that is what we have heard from Colonel Gaddafi today, saying that people - the African nations - should shy away from the Israelis because they are the ones behind all the African problems." Read more here,,,, Source: Al Jazeera (English)
By Dr. Walid Phares Over the past months, the narrative of Washington’s “new direction” in world affairs blurred the clarity of the confrontation with the terror forces worldwide. Are we at conflict with a global threat? The administration, insisting on treating the issue locally, claimed otherwise. But during President Barack Obama’s July 11th speech in Accra, he said that “when there’s a genocide in Darfur or terrorists in Somalia, these are not simply African problems — they are global security challenges, and they demand a global response.” This zigzag between local and global risk is confusing not only to the public but to strategists as well. If terrorism in Somalia is a global security challenge, then it is a global threat. And thus it is a global confrontation, call it war or call it anything else. Therefore, the response has to be global, security, military, political, economic, and ideological. Responding to the Jihadi threat throughout Africa must be continental and integrated with international efforts. The president should have drawn the attention of his audience to the trans-African Jihadi threat commencing in Somalia with the al-Shabab, and thrusting through the immensity of the Sahel via Chad, Niger, Mali, and Mauritania. The menace is even wider as the Salafists (al Qaeda-like Jihadists) threaten northern Africa via Algeria, Morocco, and even Egypt. Unfortunately, neither the Cairo nor the Accra speeches described the terror threat in full. In the next few years, 50 percent of the continent will be involved in a full-fledged war with terror. That is not a little detail obstructing development; that is the main threat against social, economic, and democratic progress across Africa. The Jihadists aren’t just some extremists with local demand: they have an all-out agenda diametrically opposed to the modern democratic agenda and to U.S. efforts in international development. In his speech Obama raised another point of confusion created by the administration: The ideology of the global threat. Since early 2009, (but also under the last two years of the George W. Bush administration), all reference to the existence of “an” ideology, doctrine, or school of thought of the foe, let alone its name, was scrapped out of the lexicon. The “J” word (Jihad) was banned along with all “I” words (Islamism, etc). Until the Accra address, the Obama speech writers wanted the public to digest the idea that there is no ideological battle. But in front of an all-African legislative audience in Ghana, Obama resuscitated the unavoidable conclusion: “That is why we must stand up to inhumanity in our midst. It is never justified, never justifiable to target innocents in the name of ideology.” So is it or is it not an ideology, regardless of what one wishes to call it? In Africa, we cannot convince the people subjected to Wahhabi, Salafi, or Khomeinist propaganda that ideology has nothing to do with the massacre of black men, women, and children. But in Cairo, we didn’t raise the issue. In Washington, we act as if we want it to go away by changing our lexicon. In the end, Africa knows all too well the nature of the ideological menace. It knows its name, its goals, and it has seen its work. The U.S. must catch up with the continent’s deep and dramatic knowledge of the roots of “evil.” Twice in his speech, Obama asserted that “we must start from the simple premise that Africa’s future is up to Africans.” Indeed, after the receding of Western colonialism during the last decades of the 20th century, who is obstructing Africa’s global independence? What regional and international organizations are controlling the African vote at the United Nations, paralyzing the African Union when it decides to intervene against ethnic cleansing in Darfur, southern Sudan, and Biafra, or to solve civil wars in Cote d’Ivoire and Somalia? The Arab League controls 10 of Africa’s countries and the Organization of the Islamic Conference covers half of the continent. Both organizations are essentially commanded by oil-producing regimes and jointly “colonize” the African Union. NATO, the EU, the CIS, and the OAS have no membership in Africa. But OPEC’s big boys determine at what price Nigerians, Ghanaians, and others must sell their oil. What I have coined as “oil imperialism” in my last book has been devastating third world independence since 1973, when petrodollars pushed back against the West and intimidated weaker nations. If oil regimes can exert influence in the world’s most powerful capitals, how can poor African nations resist their domination? FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Dr Walid Phares is the author of The Confrontation: Winning the War against Future Jihad. He is the Director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a visiting scholar at the European Foundation for Democracy. Source: Faith Freedom
July 06 | Posted by Sherri Mandell I am the problem. I am the one. The head of the free world referred to me, personally, my family, as the reason for the unrest in the world . With a broom in my hand, trying gamely to clean up the popcorn from my son's movie party, I am the reason that there is no world peace. Obama handed me the world's destiny. He told me - 'if you stop building, stop growing, all will be right in the Middle East. Don't even think of Iran or Darfur or the honor killing of the women in your region. Your home renovation is the cause of war.' I am a settler. If I move 8 kilometers to Jerusalem, then I cease being a settler, I suppose. But then I am an Israeli. And that too is a problem. The peacemakers assure us that if we leave our homes, then there will be peace. And not just peace in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Peace in all of the Arab world. Peace in the entire world. 'That bully Ahmadinejad, don't worry about him. Sherri the settler, just leave your house with the blue windows, and the winds of peace will sweep across this world.' Never mind that before there were settlements, there was a PLO. Never mind that the Palestinians have refused the most generous offers from the Israeli state, including 97 percent of Judea and Samaria as reported in the Washington Post on May 29th. Never mind that there is room for Arabs and Jews in the West Bank and that a Palestinian government that cannot allow Jews to dwell in its borders is a fascist state. Never mind that Israel itself has more than a million Arabs living among us. Never mind. There is practically nobody more reviled in the world today than a settler. We are seen as gun-toting racists, extremists, parallel to the extremists on the other side. Never mind that it is exceedingly rare for a Jew to be a terrorist. Never mind that those other extremists murder Jewish children like my son Koby with their bare hands just because they are Jews. Never mind that those other extremists send their own children to commit suicide as martyrs. Never mind that those extremists kill their own people by firing squad if they are suspected of being collaborators. Never mind that those extremists oppress their women. Never mind that those extremists are intolerant of homosexuality in their communities. But it is the settlers who are the problem. I was on a TV show where a Tel Aviv metropolitan woman referred to me as the 'cancer of the Jewish people.' There is nobody so bad and evil as a settler. We are the scapegoat of the world. It could be said that we are the Jews of the Jews. We are so convenient an object of hatred. Source: JPost Blogs
The trouble with Black Muslims
By Rudolf Okonkwo, June 28, 9:41 AM Even Obama cannot say it. But someone has to say it.
We cannot be talking about this season of hate without mentioning the steep decline into actionable hate by misguided black Muslims.
The first time I met a black Muslim in America was in the 90s. I had just arrived from England and this man wearing a bow tie and three-piece-suit approached me with a copy of the Final Call newspaper – the official mouthpiece of Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam. He wanted me to buy the newspaper but I resisted. He told me it was the bestselling newspaper in America. I told him I was new in America but I was sure the Final Call could not be the bestselling newspaper in America.
“You’ve been brainwashed,” the man said to me.
“By whom?” I asked.
“By the blue-eyed white devils who run the world.”
“O’ yeah.”
“They don’t want you to know the truth.”
“Like what?”
“Like all the great things our forefathers did.”
“Like what?”
“Bro, you have to open your eyes. We have to get on with the program of our forefathers.”
“And what is that program?”
That was how we began a discussion about the world and the place of the black man in it.
“Why are you a Muslim?” I asked him at one point.
“Because my people were Muslims before the blue-eyed white devils bought us and brought us to America as slaves and forced us to be Christians and to worship a blue-eyed Christ.”
“O’ yeah.”
“Yes!”
“But I am from Africa and my grandfather was never a Muslim nor was he a Christian.”
He was shocked when I said that.
“It is OK if you want to be a Muslim and follow Elijah Muhammed and changed your name to Muhammed, too. But don’t tell me you are trying to be like your forefathers,” I said.
And for four years, we continued our debate. Like some members of the Nation of Islam, he became a convert to Muslim while in prison on drug charges. He had accepted the myths of the Nation of Islam. He told with all the seriousness in his bones that the white man was made in a laboratory in Egypt by a black scientist named Yakub. By the time I left Virginia where I met him, he remained unchanged.
I must say that the Nation of Islam does not advocate militancy. Though separatist in ideology, it does not encourage its members to bear arms. Many young black men coming out of prison have instead joined the mainstream Islam. None of the Muslim converts arrested in recent bombing plots have been linked to the Nation of Islam.
The recent plot by some Muslim converts to bomb the Jewish synagogue in New York and the killing of an army recruiter by another Muslim convert in Arkansas have muddled things up. Before then, there was a group of Muslim converts, mainly from Haiti, who planned to blow up Chicago Sears Tower from their base in Florida.
Some of these people are carrying their misguided and misrepresented history and anger out in the open and are even planning to act on them. It concerns me. And it should concern you, too.
First of all, I came from a country where there are Muslims. Those who have Arabic features assume superior position over those who are black. In many instances, the black Muslims are totally disregarded, treated as inconsequential.
I have asked black Muslims mad at how white people treated black slaves to ask themselves were the millions of slaves the Arab world took from Africa were? They disappeared. They were used and disposed of. If not, the Arab world would be booming with its own share of black men and women.
I have asked black Muslims mad at the “war” between the West and Islam to look at the genocide in Darfur and find out how Muslims treat their black brothers and sisters.
In Africa, the homeland of all black people, Islam came from the Middle East and Christianity came from Europe and they all exerted inordinate damage. But where Islam touched, there is no recognition of the ways of life of the people. Islam, being a way of life, swallowed all that was African in the people.
All black people must think before they jump from frying pan to fire. And before you pick up arms to fight for those Talibans dying in Afghanistan, spare a minute for two million children who die of malaria each year in Sub-Saharan Africa. Those are your people. For real! Source: http://www.examiner.com/x-14375-Democrat-Examiner~y2009m6d28-The-trouble-with-Black-Muslims
LE MONDE ARABO-ISLAMIQUE ENVERS LE SOUDAN (DARFOUR): ENTRE ESCLAVAGE, TRAITE NÉGRIÈRE ET NETTOYAGE ETHNIQUE Le génocide voilé (voir impérativement la vidéo)
24 Juin 2008 En France lorsqu'on veut empêcher la lecture d'un livre on ne le censure pas. Du moins officiellement. Il s'agit là d'une pratique archaïque laissée aux dictatures. Non, en France on a mieux : l'indifférence des grands médias. C'est ainsi qu'un superbe ouvrage, "Le Génocide voilé", a fait l'objet d'un véritable boycott médiatique. Et pour cause, il décortique un sujet brûlant : la traite négrière arabo-musulmane. S'il semble, aujourd'hui, aisé de parler de l'esclavage transatlantique, ce n'est pas le cas pour celui concernant la partie subsaharienne. Il existerait comme un mutisme. Et lorsqu'on sait que l'auteur est l'anthropologue et économiste Tidiane N'Diaye connu pour être est l'un des grands spécialistes des civilisations négro-africaines et de leurs diasporas on comprend mieux la gêne de ceux qui ne cessent de culpabiliser les Occidentaux. Vidéo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcIcd3T2BMw Le génocide voilé
Présentation de l'éditeur" Les Arabes ont razzié l'Afrique subsaharienne pendant treize siècles sans interruption. La plupart des millions d'hommes qu'ils ont déportés ont disparu du fait des traitements inhumains. Cette douloureuse page de l'histoire des peuples noirs n'est apparemment pas définitivement tournée. La traite négrière a commencé lorsque l'émir et général arabe Abdallah ben Saïd a imposé aux Soudanais un bakht (accord), conclu en 652, les obligeant à livrer annuellement des centaines d'esclaves. La majorité de ces hommes était prélevée sur les populations du Darfour. Et ce fut le point de départ d'une énorme ponction humaine qui devait s'arrêter officiellement au début du XXe siècle. "Biographie de l'auteurL'anthropologue et économiste Tidiane N'Diaye est l'un des grands spécialistes des civilisations négro-africaines et de leurs diasporas. Il est l'auteur de nombreux ouvrages sur ce sujet. Commentaire au Livre Le Coran légitime l’inégalité constitutive entre le maître et son serviteur. Il parle des esclaves « qu’Allah a fait tomber entre vos mains » (Ainsi Sourate 33,49). Il voit aussi dans la réussite matérielle le signe d’une grâce divine. « Allah a favorisé certains d’entre vous, plus que d’autres, dans la répartition de ses dons. Que ceux qui ont été favorisés ne reversent pas ce qui leur a été accordé à leurs esclaves, au point que ceux-ci deviennent leurs égaux- Nieront-ils les bienfaits d’Allah ? » (Sourate 16 dite des Abeilles ,71) « Allah propose en parabole un serviteur qui, en esclavage, ne peut rien, et un homme (libre) à qui Nous avons attribué de belles ressources, sur lesquelles il fait dépense en secret et en public. Sont-ils égaux ? [Non point] ! à Allah ne plaise ! Pourtant la plupart [des Impies] ne savent pas. » (16,77/75) « Allah propose (aussi) , en parabole, deux hommes dont l’un est muet, ne peut rien et est à la charge de son maître car, quelque part que celui-ci l’envoie, cet homme ne lui rapporte rien de bon.(Cet homme) est-il l’égal de son maître qui ordonne avec équité et suit une Voie Droite ? » (16,78/76) Un autre exemple tout aussi significatif Ce fut après le mariage du Prophète avec Maymûnah, (ce qui lui faisait neuf femmes) … (`Aishah, Sawdah, Umm Habîbah, Hafsah, Umm Salamah, Zaynab Bint Jahsh, Juwayriyyah, Safiyyah et Maymûnah),… que le verset suivant fut « révélé » à Mahomet: "Il ne t’est plus permis de changer d’épouses ni de prendre d’autres femmes, en dehors de tes esclaves même si tu es charmé par la beauté de certaines d’entre elles. Dieu voit parfaitement toutes choses." ( Sourate Les factions, verset 52) Après cela, le Prophète ne se maria plus jamais. Cependant, lorsqu’un souverain chrétien, ou le Muqawqis d’Egypte lui envoya deux femmes esclaves ( an 7 après l’Hégire) qui étaient sœurs en guise de cadeau (en réponse à une lettre du Prophète les invitant à embrasser l’Islam), accompagnées d’un beau vêtement et de quelques médicaments, le Prophète accepta une des deux filles, Maria, dans son foyer : il donna sa sœur Serene à un homme qu’il souhaitait honorer, à savoir Hassân Ibn Thâbit. Il accepta le vêtement, et renvoya les médicaments avec le message : " Ma sunnah est mon médicament ! " D’autres versets « révélés » juste à temps (!!!) servent à régler des tensions internes de ménage entre Mahomet et ses femmes; Ainsi les versets 1 à 3 Sourate 66 qui clôturent la débat houleux sur les activités nocturnes de Mahomet avec une esclave égyptienne et admonestent ses femmes jalouses pour leurs « objections. » D’autres versets du Coran "Heureux les croyants qui sont humbles dans leurs prières, qui évitent les propos vains, qui font l'aumône, qui se contentent de leurs rapports avec leurs épousées et leurs captives..." Sourate XXIII Les croyants. Captives: littéralement ce que possèdent vos mains droites c'est à dire vos "Captives de guerre" Sourate IV,3, ou vos esclaves IV,24 et 25. Ailleurs ce terme s'applique aux esclaves en général: "Vous devez usez de bonté envers ...vos esclaves" Sourate IV, 36 - ou à des esclaves de sexe masculin Sourate XXIV, 33 et 58. Et enfin la Sourate IV, 25... un grand moment d’humanisme "Celui qui parmi vous n'a pas les moyens d"épouser des femmes croyantes et de bonne condition, prendra des captives de guerres croyantes." Les relations sexuelles entre le maître et ses femmes esclaves sont les seules relations sexuelles hors mariage acceptées par le Coran «À l’exception des hommes chastes qui n’ont de rapports qu’avec leurs épouses et avec leurs captives de guerre; -ils ne sont donc pas blâmables, tandis que ceux qui en convoitent d’autres sont transgresseurs», sourate LXX, verset 29-31. Source: http://www.islamisation.fr/archive/2008/06/01/le-genocide-voile.html
By Robert Spencer Genocide in Darfur? Relax! At its summit last week in Qatar, the Arab League decisively rejected the International Criminal Court’s indictment of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. “We emphasis our solidarity with Sudan and our dismissal and rejection of the decision handed down by the International Criminal Court,” read the Arab League communiqué. It is worth exploring with what exactly the Arab League is expressing solidarity. Al-Bashir has overseen the genocidal campaign of the government-backed Janjaweed militias in the Darfur region of western Sudan, in which 400,000 people have been killed and over 2,500,000 left homeless. In 2004, the United Nations Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Sudan said the situation in Darfur was “world’s greatest humanitarian crisis.” Read more ...Source: Human Events
 By LORRIE GOLDSTEIN
Dear Israeli Apartheid Week enthusiasts: Greetings and congratulations on your ongoing fifth annual Israeli Apartheid Week, which I understand began at the University of Toronto in 2005 and has now spread to 40 universities around the world. While I don't agree with your mindlessly simplistic likening of Israel to apartheid South Africa in its treatment of the Palestinians -- just as I would never describe the Palestinians as terrorists because that would be wrong and inhuman -- I also believe in free speech.
That's why I'm not calling for your event to be canceled, or to have your posters depicting Israeli gunships swooping down on Palestinian children in Gaza taken down. That said, since the Sword of Allah cuts both ways, so to speak, I will be urging my alma mater to accommodate the following on-campus events next year at this time.
Darfur Destruction Week: An examination of the slaughter in Sudan, where hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children have been forced from their homes, starved, tortured, raped and murdered in the world's worst ongoing human rights disaster and old, familiar pastime -- Muslims killing other Muslims.
Iranian Intelligence Week: An exploration of the comedic stylings of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who unforgettably told a Columbia University audience in 2007 that Iran has no gays or lesbians. To wit: "In Iran, we don't have homosexuals, like in your country ... I don't know who has told you we have that."
Syrian Bulldozer Week: A retrospective on the savage attack on the city of Hama by the late Syrian dictator Hafez al-Hassad, during which thousands of innocent civilians died while Syrian forces mercilessly crushed a revolt by the Muslim Brotherhood. Particular attention will be paid to the bulldozing of the rubble, apparently the Syrian idea of "urban renewal."
Hamas Hitler Week: A study and discussion of the similarities between the philosophies of Hamas and Hitler, drawing on the Hamas Charter and Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf. A special seminar will be devoted to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem's support of Hitler and the Nazis during the Second World War.
Pakistani Honour Killing Week: Examining the ... uh ... intellectual basis
behind "honour killings" in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, described by Amnesty International thusly: "Women in Pakistan live in fear. They face death by shooting, burning or killing with axes if they are deemed to have brought shame on the family ... They are even murdered by their kin if they are raped, as they are thereby deemed to have brought shame on their family."
Saudi Arabian Suicide Week: A study of the role played by Saudi Arabia in funding and exporting radical Islamist Wahhabi theology throughout the world, while many among its oil-rich ruling class would be the first to be beheaded for their decadent lifestyles, should Islamists ever seize power.
Anyway, those are just some of the events I'm working on for next year. And not to worry. I doubt any of them will steal your thunder. Heck, you can just blame them all on the Jews ... oops ... I mean "on Israel" anyway, eh?
Shalom,
Lorrie Goldstein Source: Naomi Ragen
PubMed is is a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine that includes over 18 million citations from various life science journals for biomedical articles back to 1948 - the medical version of Google. Dr. Simon Fishman entered searches for citations relating to victims of international conflicts, including Palestinians. Such a search reveals articles in medical journals examining a whole range of genuine healthcare issues such as the psychological effects of war on Rwandan, Bosnian and Darfurian children, HIV testing in Rwanda, and other studies that are not necessarily focused on death tolls from such conflicts. Nonetheless, using the casualty figures from a range of conflict zones as a simple judge of scale produced the following results:  Dr. Fishman concluded the following from his figures: - When Europeans kill Europeans (Bosnia), the BMJ allocates one citation for every 2000 deaths. - When Africans kill Africans (Rwanda), the BMJ allocates one citation for every 4000 deaths. - When Muslim Arabs kill Black Africans (Darfur), the BMJ allocates one citation for every (minimum) 7000 Dafurians who are killed. - When Israelis, in the process of combating terrorists, kill Palestinians, the BMJ allocates one citation for every 13 Palestinians killed (including terrorist combatants). - When Arab Muslims kill Kurds, the BMJ fails to give this any attention whatsoever. The evidence clearly shows that the BMJ has a disproportionate interest in Palestinian deaths over those from other conflict areas where the impact on public health is certainly as great and potentially greater than that of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This bias is consistent with its attacks on the so-called "Israel lobby." If the journal maintained editorial balance, it would be less vulnerable to criticism on the issue and would have less reason to resort to conspiracy theories to deflect legitimate criticism. Read more ... Source: Honest ReportingH/T: Gramfan BMJ
Latest recipient of the Yellow Rag Award
By Robert Spencer A Muslim blogger asked that question, wondering if more Muslims would be outraged over Darfur if the perpetrator of the genocide were different. And the answer, of course, is yes. I first encountered Aziz Poonawalla during my dialogue of the deaf with the raving lunatic blogger Dean Esmay, as Poonawalla was and may still be a contributor to his blog. Poonawalla and I also have had several unpleasant exchanges, during which I didn't get from him an overwhelming impression of honesty or integrity. However, in a post over at Beliefnet (thanks to Twostellas), although larded with Palestinian hate propaganda, he actually manages to state -- or at least quote -- some truths about Darfur. Read more ...Source: Jihad Watch
By Savo Heleta When Muslims suffer around the world in the hands of Americans, Russians, Serbs, or Israelis, the Arab and Muslim countries are very active in condemning the attacks and violence. Their governments complain and raise funds, diplomats protest, the media report, and the citizens demonstrate against "crusaders and infidels." But when Muslims suffer in the hands of an Arab regime, then there is barely any condemnation of the violence and crimes in the Arab and Muslim world. Since 2003, Sudan's western province of Darfur is an epicenter of a conflict between the mainly "African" rebels and the Arab-controlled Sudanese government and their proxy militias. It is estimated that about 200,000 people have died in the conflict from fighting, disease, and starvation. The UN and aid agencies estimate that over two million Darfurians, out of a population of about six million, are living in refugee camps in Darfur and neighboring countries. Read more ...Source: Gather.com
THE HAGUE (AFP) - The prosecutor for the International Criminal Court on Monday asked for an arrest warrant against Sudan's President Omar al-Beshir for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur. Beshir had "personally instructed" his forces to annihilate three ethnic groups in the western Sudanese region, prosecutor Luis Moreno- Ocampo told journalists in The Hague. "His motives were largely political. His alibi was a counter-insurgency.' His intent was genocide," he said. The president had ordered his forces "not to bring back any wounded or prisoners," he added. "He wanted to commit genocide." Sudan immediately rejected the bid as damaging to Darfur peace hopes, and the African Union warned the indictment of Beshir would create a power vacuum that risked "military coups and widespread anarchy". Jihad WatchSource: AFP H/T: Jihad WatchOmar Hassan al-Bashir
Latest recipient of the Distinguished Islamofascist Award
By William R. Hawkins Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, briefed the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) in an open meeting June 5 about his investigation regarding Darfur. He spoke of massive atrocities being committed there and warned, “The entire Darfur region is a crime scene.” The Brazilian lawyer said that the Government of Sudan is not cooperating in the arrest and surrender of the two suspects the Court has indicted, Ahmad Harun and Ali Kushayb. He asked the Security Council to make it clear that the two fugitives, and those who protect them, will not receive leniency from the international community. But there is no “international community.” The UNSC is composed of individual countries with their own interests to pursue, which leaves them divided on issues like Sudan. Read more ...Source: FrontPage Magazine
By Edith M. Lederer UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The conflict in Darfur is deteriorating, with full deployment of a new peacekeeping force delayed until 2009 and no prospect of a political settlement for a war that has killed perhaps 300,000 people in five years, U.N. officials said Tuesday. Read more ...Source: AP
"Even though we're Muslim, the Islamic world has done nothing to protect us", said Yassin, a refugee whose tortured flight from Darfur finally brought him to Israel three years ago. He was one of the first Darfurians to make it into Israel across the border from Egypt, and has dedicated his life to helping hundreds of his fellow countrymen who have made the same perilous journey. Read more ...Source: Guardian
 By Lydia Polgreen SULEIA, Sudan: The janjaweed are back. They came to this dusty town in the Darfur region of Sudan on horses and camels on market day. Almost everybody was in the bustling square. At the first clatter of automatic gunfire, everyone ran. The militiamen laid waste to the town - burning huts, pillaging shops, carrying off any loot they could find and shooting anyone who stood in their way, residents said. Asha Abdullah Abakar, wizened and twice widowed, described how she hid in a hut, praying it would not be set on fire. Read more ...Source: IHT
 |
|
|
Copyright Muslims Against Sharia 2008. All rights reserved.
E-mail: info AT ReformIslam.org
|
|
|
Sudan is accusing the upcoming Danish movie by Susanne Bier of being in the same class as the Muhammmed cartoons. 
Posts
